1. Plaintiff A, B, and C’s primary claim and ancillary claim against the nullification of Defendant limited partnership companies.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the plaintiffs and the defendants 1) The defendant limited partnership company's piracy (hereinafter "piracy")

) The transmission of the Defendant Limited Partnership Company and the Defendant Limited Partnership Company (hereinafter referred to as “transmission”).

(2) The plaintiffs A, B, and C have worked as office members from the date of entry into each of the above plaintiffs' claims by the plaintiff's attached amount to each of the above plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs D, E, and F have worked as office members from the date of entry into each of the above plaintiffs' claims by the plaintiff's attached amount to the plaintiff's attached amount to the above plaintiffs.

B. By December 13, 2010, the Mining District: (a) compiled a retirement allowance for the clerical staff among the employees belonging to the Defendants’ companies, and paid them to the Defendants in the formulation of a budget as indirect labor cost; (b) Gwangju Metropolitan City notified the Defendants of the result of a comprehensive audit to ensure that the employees’ personnel expenses for the clerical staff are paid in the general management expenses of the Defendants, since the labor expenses for the clerical staff among the employees belonging to the Defendants, not indirect labor expenses, based on the cost accounting system; and (c) accordingly, on December 29, 2010, the Mining District announced the Defendants of the result of the comprehensive audit to ensure that the employees’ personnel expenses for the clerical staff are paid in the general management expenses of the Defendants.

The mine district and the Defendants agreed that the labor cost of the clerical staff belonging to the Defendants companies, which are the matters pointed out by Gwangju Metropolitan City in the comprehensive audit, shall be included in the general management expenses, and the mine district and the Defendants shall bear the burden of the Defendants for the continuous service period until December 31, 2010 among the Plaintiffs’ retirement allowances.

3) Since 2011, the Defendants and the mine district demanded the Plaintiffs to make interim settlement of the retirement allowances, according to the general management expenses for the clerical staff. On January 201, 201, the Plaintiffs were to make interim settlement of the retirement allowances for the period from the Plaintiffs’ respective date of employment to December 31, 2010 (hereinafter “instant retirement allowances”).