A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine not exceeding three million won.

However, the above imprisonment for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2011 Gohap2] The Defendant served in the F Team of the Seoul Guro Police Station from April 2004 to around June 2009, and was working in the G zone. H served in one group at the former Guro Police Station F Team by March 22, 2007 with the Defendant, and transferred to the first team. From February 23, 2009, the Defendant served in the F Team again with the Defendant.

1. On January 5, 2009, when the Guro-gu Seoul K Game Center was controlled by the J on January 22 and 30, 2009, the Defendant investigated the game room-related persons upon request of L to investigate it well at that time.

H around May 11, 2009, as well as the words written by dividing L with the Defendant, transferred KRW 3 million to the bank account (M) in the name of H to the bank account in the name of H. On May 12, 2009. On May 11, 2009, around KRW 1 million was remitted to the foreign exchange bank account in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with H, received a bribe of KRW 3 million in relation to the duties of police officers from L.

2. Preparation of false official documents and the display of false official documents;

A. On September 15, 2009, the Defendant prepared a false official document stating that “The fact in the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G District does not discover L by means of an autopsy,” on the location and location column of “the discovery report on the location of a person notifying a geographical name” printed by a computer in order to secure control performance, the Defendant entered “L” as “the fact that he inspected, searched and searched on the street front of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan GovernmentO No. 16:50, Sept. 15, 2009 and signed on “L” in the confirmation column using a test color pen.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant prepared a false report on the discovery of the designated person in the name of the defendant, who is an official document.

B. The Defendant had submitted to the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor’s Office a false report on the discovery of the whereabouts of a person who has reported false information at the same time and place, and exercised the false official document.

Summary of Evidence

1..