logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.06.16 2014가단57434
대여금
Text

1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 50,000,000 won and 6% per annum from June 1, 2015 to June 16, 2015.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserted that: (a) the Plaintiff lent KRW 50 million to Defendant B with interest rate of KRW 6% per annum; and (b) September 30, 2014; and (c) the Defendant C provided joint and several sureties with respect thereto; (b) the Defendants failed to pay the above loan obligations, thereby having remaining in KRW 50,410,958, the principal and interest on the loan as of October 7, 2014.

Therefore, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff 50,410,958 won and the loan principal of KRW 50,000,000 per annum from October 8, 2014 to the delivery date of a copy of the instant complaint, and damages for delay calculated by 20% per annum from the next day to the full payment date.

2. In full view of each of the statements in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, there is no dispute between the parties, or comprehensively taking into account the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff loaned KRW 50 million to Defendant B on October 18, 2013 at interest rate of KRW 6% per annum, maturity of payment, September 30, 2014, Defendant C guaranteed the above loan obligations against the Plaintiff on the same day, and Defendant B paid the Plaintiff the interest agreed upon on May 2015 with respect to the above loan obligations. Accordingly, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff from June 1, 2015 to June 16, 2015, the following day after the agreed interest rate of KRW 50 million, and to the extent of the Defendants’ obligation to pay damages for delay at the annual rate of KRW 20% per annum from the day after the agreed interest rate to June 16, 2015.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, each of them is accepted, and the remaining claims are without merit, and they are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow