beta
Text
The defendant's judgment [2012 Highest 393] 1-A, 2-B and 2-B shall be sentenced to imprisonment for two months and the rest of the judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2012 Highest 393] On February 18, 2011, the Defendant, at the Seoul Central District Court, sentenced two years of suspension of execution to imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business and obstruction of performance of official duties, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 26, 2011.
1. Interference with business;
A. On October 2010, from around 21:00 to 21:20 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s bar business business by force by leaving the victim’s bar business by force, by leaving the victim from entering the said business by avoiding disturbance, such as passing the victim’s disturbance to the victim on the ground that the victim had changed the drinking value, and making it difficult for the victim to enter the victim’s bar business on the ground that he/she did not sit on the camera and the table.
B. On January 201, 201, from around 21:00 to 21:10 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s bar business business by force by force by preventing customers from entering the said business by avoiding disturbance, such as passing a disturbance, on the ground that the said victim changed the drinking value. Ultimately, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s bar business by force.
C. On April 201, from around 22:00 to 22:20 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s bar business by force by leaving the victim’s bar business by force, by leaving the Defendant from entering the cryp to the cryp, for the reason that the said victim refused to sell alcoholic beverages, such as “cryp and the credit rating is located anywhere,” on the ground that the said victim refused to sell alcoholic beverages.
The Defendant, on October 20, 201, from around 22:00 to 22:20 on the same day, obstructed the victim’s bar business by force by failing to enter the victim’s bar business by leaving the disturbance, such as “whether the bit of bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit,
E. The Defendant from around 22:00 to around April 2012.