Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the property by drinking the victim C’s “D Licensed Real Estate Agent D” office operated by Ansan-gu, Ansan-si on the ground that its future unstable on the road in front of the “D Licensed Real Estate Agent D’s Office” office operated by the victim C; (b) by walking the lock-gate lock-down system of the above office amounting to approximately 50,000 won, which is the victim’s possession, and then destroying it by shaking it by

2. At around 00:10 on February 14, 2015, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender causing property damage on the ground that he was reported and sent to the office of the said “D Licensed Real Estate Agent” on the front of the said “D Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office, as referred to in paragraph (1). The Defendant was transferred to the Ansan Police Station of the Ansan Police Station E District Police Station, which was arrested as a flagrant offender causing property damage. The Defendant was transferred to the Ansan Police Station, which was located in the 10th of the

On February 14, 2015, at around 01:30, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the custody of flagrant offenders, by assaulting the FF’s left side buckbucks, and walking the knee two times, and assaulting the FF’s right side knee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in which each police statement to G, F and C is written;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and the proviso of Article 50 and Article 42 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order appears to be an contingent crime that happens under the influence of alcohol for the reason of sentencing, there is no criminal power against the defendant, and shows an attitude against the crime of this case, and the victim C and the victimized police officer agreed smoothly with the victim C, to choose a fine and determine the amount of fine, taking into account all the circumstances into account.