A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 04:10 on February 19, 2020, the Defendant: (a) stated that “the Defendant was assaulted against a taxi engineer” on the front way in Daegu Northern-gu B, Daegu-gu, upon receiving a report from the Defendant; (b) the police officer stated that “I would like to go back, friend, friend, following friend,” and that “I would like to go back, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend, friend

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the protection of police officers' lives, bodies, and property, prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal internal investigation (Attachment to the attachment, etc. of a copy, etc. of the work site) to the defendant's partial statement of witness H, G, E's each legal statement of the police officer's statement of H, G, E, E, E, and I (the attachment of a copy, etc. of the work site) internal investigation report (the document of 119 reported telephone recording and the document of 112 reported processing) on the defendant's partial statement (the suspect's speech and behavior in the criminal department and office at the time of criminal investigation and office) internal investigation report (the confirmation of

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Selection of an alternative imprisonment with prison labor under Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act takes into account the factors for sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant, such as: (a) the Defendant assaulted police officers to obstruct the performance of official duties; (b) the responsibility of the relevant crime was heavy; (c) the police officers under the influence of alcohol; and (d) the fact that it appears to have avoided long-time disturbance even after moving to the police station; and (c) the Defendant has no criminal records exceeding the same criminal records and fines, taking into account the factors for