logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원남원지원 2016.01.14 2014가합1308
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) 20% per annum from November 29, 2014 to September 30, 2015 for the Republic of China’s Republic of China’s Republic of China’s Republic of China’s Republic of China’s Republic of China’s Republic of Korea.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. On January 16, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the Defendant for the sale of eight tons of Chinese gyn Chinese 960,000 Chinese gyn Chinese gyn (120,000 Chinese gyn Chinese gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gyn gynn

3) 이 사건 매매계약에 따라 원고는 중국의 수출업체인 중경가력홍산식품 유한공사(重加力紅山食品 有限公司, CHONGQING JIALI HONSAN FOOD Co. Ltd., 이하 ‘중국수출회사’라고 한다

(1) On January 25, 2011, the Plaintiff exported the Defendant with eight ton of China with eight ton of China on January 25, 2011 (based on recognition). [The Defendant: (a) led to a confession on the second date for pleading that the Plaintiff purchased the Chinese Doctrine on the Chinese 960,000; (b) on the fifth date for pleading, the Plaintiff and the Defendant first determined the sales amount as US$72,000 ( US$9,000 per ton) at the time of entering into the instant sales contract; and (c) thereafter, the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to prepare and submit a joint document (Evidence No. 1) and a written contract (Evidence No. 2) (Evidence No. 1) with the content that the sales amount was 960,000 to China; and (d) ultimately, the Defendant revoked the confession by asserting that the sales amount stipulated in the instant sales contract was US 72,000.

However, there is no evidence to prove the facts of the defendant's assertion, and there is no evidence to prove that confessions are contrary to the truth and due to mistake, the revocation of confessions has no effect.

Each entry of No. 1, No. 2, No. 6, No. 1, and No. 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts acknowledged earlier, the Defendant did not have any special reason to the Plaintiff.

arrow