Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was an incorporated Korean entertainment restaurant C branch employee, and the victim D is an employee of the above branch.

1. The Defendant of defamation on October 2014, 201, called “D” to the Secretary E of the Office E of the Korean Entertainment restaurant C branch, an incorporated association, in a closed and irregular area on October 1, 2014.

The term “patently damaged the reputation of the victim” by openly speaking the victim’s previous conviction, etc.

2. The Defendant of defamation on April 2015, 2015, who retired from the above sub-chapter F at around 19:00, by means of the trade name in Busan-dong, Busan-gu, Busan-do, and then was under suspension of the execution of the sentence as of April 11, 2015.

Does such argue be a member of the corporation

The phrase “patently damaged the reputation of the victim by openly speaking the victim’s previous conviction, etc.

3. The Defendant of defamation on April 2015: (a) around 18:30 on the lower day on April 2015, 2015; (b) “D is a person before 11 criminal records and bad credit standing.”

Does such argue be a member of the corporation

The phrase “patently damaged the reputation of the victim by openly speaking the victim’s previous conviction, etc.

4. The Defendant of defamation on May 2015, 2015: (a) was not aware of the fact that the State Party D was a criminal and criminal offender on May 1, 2015 by telephone to F from around 15:00 on the first anniversary of the first anniversary.

Does such argue be a member of the corporation

The phrase “patently damaged the reputation of the victim by openly speaking the victim’s previous conviction, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of a defendant in part in the protocol of second public trial;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Partial statement of witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the largest penalty for concurrent crimes) shall be a policeman on April 2015.