logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2017.02.15 2016고단1808
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 1808"

1. On October 2014, the Defendant of defamation around 2014, at the residence of A, located in the I apartment complex of Sa city around October 2014, the Defendant: (a) did not have a sexual intercourse with the other male; (b) provided that “B entered into a sexual intercourse with Q and Mos; (c) would have a sexual intercourse with Q and Mos; and (d) would have a sexual intercourse with the head of the Dong and the head of the Gu and the head of the Gu and the head; (b) the husband of B would report and engage in female funeral; and (c) said, the Defendant would have a face of KRW 10,000,000,000, but the face was lower; and (d) publicly, the Defendant injured the victim’s reputation by misrepresenting false facts.”

2. On December 2014, the Defendant of defamation refers to L at the S Mari S Mari-si shop located in R, and refers to L at the shop of Mari-si, namely, “Lari-si (B) brought about 10 million won in sex.”

“The honor of the victim was damaged by publicly alleging the fact to the effect that it was “.”

3.2014. 겨울 경 명예훼손 피고인은 2014. 겨울 경 불상지에서 C에게 사실은 피해자 B이 파출부 일을 한 적이 없고 다른 남자들과 성관계를 한 사실이 없음에도 “B 은 다른 집에서 파출부 일을 했고, 남자 동생뻘 되는 사람과 술을 마시고 모텔에서 잤다.

“The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

4. On January 2015, the Defendant’s defamation refers to C with respect to the victim B at a Buddhist land on January 2015, and “B may leave money while providing a female funeral service to the trainee’s home.

Thus, the reputation of the victim was damaged by publicly alleging the fact that the face is “in the shape of the face,” to the effect that the face is cut up in the face once.

The Defendant and the Victim C, around 2008, had been close to one another by the Defendant and the Victim C, who had been employed by the victimized children as infant care teachers in 2008. The Defendant, B, L, A, T, and U are known to each other from the Defendant.

arrow