logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.09.01 2017고단1714
모욕등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6,00,000 won;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant’s insult on June 4, 2017, around 08:20, on the road in front of the Nowon-gu Seoul Western Police Station North Korea Police Station, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 59-1, and on the road in front of the Public Security Center, the Defendant reported a taxi flag that the Defendant would not pay a taxi fee to the victim C, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station, dispatched by the Defendant after receiving a report on the taxi flag, is on the spot on which many drivers hear, and is a large sture.

“A serious bath,” etc. was made.

As such, the Defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. Damage to public goods and intrusion on buildings;

A. On June 4, 2017, around 08:45, the Defendant came to the North Asia’s current Public Security Center at around 08:45, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, opened the entrance of the said Public Security Center at around 30 times with the launching and body, and installed an electronic locking device at around 30 times, and installed the locking device at the entrance in favor of the Defendant, and attached the locking device and the glass entrance so that the sum of the repair cost would be KRW 500,000.

As such, the defendant damaged the use of the articles used by the current North Korean Public Security Center, a public service worker, thereby impairing its utility.

B. At the time and place set forth in the above paragraph (a) above, the locking device of the public security center was set up to prevent any person other than the manager or authorized person from entering the center, and entered the door of the office through the entrance, and opened up to the rooftop through the stairs.

As such, the Defendant intruded on a structure managed by a person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Investigation report (related to a suspect's insult and damage to public goods);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 311 of the Criminal Act ( point of insult) of the choice of punishment, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act ( point of damage to public goods), Article 319 of the Criminal Act ( point of damage to buildings), and selection of fines, respectively;

2. Article 37. Aggravation of the Criminal Code

arrow