The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 11, 2016, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around 05:03, at C cafeteria located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul; (b) installed the entrance door of the store as drinking without any special reason; and (c) damaged property equivalent to KRW 1.7 million at the market price.

2. The Defendant, who damaged public goods, was arrested as an offender in the act of damaging property at the above time and place, destroyed the front door of the vehicle No. 24, which was managed by the New Village District of Seoul Seodaemun-gu Police Station, by walking the back door of the vehicle at several times, thereby damaging the 250,000 won of the market price attached to the vehicle and back seat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of damage to property for public use) and the selection of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. 1.5 million won of a fine for negligence, the sentence of which is suspended; and

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (one-day conversion amount: 100,000 won);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da15488, Apr. 2, 2009) (see, 201; 200Da14488, Apr. 2, 201); 201Da3138, Apr. 1, 2006).