A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor on April 10, 2014, and completed the execution of official duties on August 28, 2014, at the Sungnam branch support, by obstructing the execution of official duties at the Busan District Court. On May 26, 2017, the above sentence became final and conclusive on June 3, 2017, upon being sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Busan District Court.

[Criminal facts]

1. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2017. 1. 13. 22:10 경 부산 사하구 C에 있는 부산 사 하경 찰 서 D 치안 센터 앞 노상에서, 경찰관과 상담할 것이 있다는 내용으로 112 신고를 한 후 현장에 출동한 위 치안 센터 소속 경위 E, 경위 F에게 “ 개새끼들아! 전부 씹어 부 까!”, “ 개새끼들, 전부 죽여 버려야 해, 짭새들은 다 죽여 버려야 해! ”라고 소리치고, 소지하고 있던 휴대폰을 치안 센타 출입문 유리를 향해 던져 위 출입문을 파손하고 발로 출입문을 걷어차는 등 경찰관들에게 마치 위해를 가할 것처럼 태도를 취하여 112 신고 업무처리 및 치안 센터 근무에 관한 경찰관들의 정당한 공무집행을 방해하였다.

2. On January 26, 2017, around 22:20, the Defendant damaged public goods by cutting a stone in and around the vicinity of the D Public Security Center as well as destroying public goods by cutting down the entrance door of the above Public Security Center, which is composed of 440,00 won of the market value ( approximately 80cm in width, approximately 180cm in vertical length, approximately 180cm in thickness, about 10cm in thickness), around 22:20, 2017.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on January 26, 2017, and around 22:25, the Defendant assaulted the police officer of the H Public Security Center to the police officer of the H Public Security Center, within the Busan Habdo-gu Busan Hab-gu G, which was located in the Busan Habdo-gu.

why there is no person working for the Public Security Center;

This C. F.O.T.T. f.O.T.

“Along with sound, a police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties in relation to global service was posted on coffees and cups on his water purifiers, which had been placed on the water purifiers, and obstructed the said I’s legitimate performance of official duties.

4. The defendant interferes with the performance of official duties.