A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2019. 6. 1. 00:08경 사천시 공단1로 82에 있는 유천교차로 앞 횡단보도에서 술에 취한 상태로 B 싼타페 승용차 운전석에서 잠을 자고 있던 중 ‘차량에 시동을 켠 채로 사람이 잠을 자고 있다’는 취지의 112 신고를 받고 출동한 사천경찰서 C파출소 소속 경위 D 등으로부터 피고인에게 술 냄새가 많이 나고 발음이 부정확 하며 음주감지기에 음주반응이 나오는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 약 20분에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았다.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds by avoiding the method of crossing and refusing the above measurement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the state of his/her oral statement, and investigation reports (report on the state of his/her oral driver);

1. Article 148-2(1)2 of the relevant Act and Article 148-2(1)2 of the former Road Traffic Act (Amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018); the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. Discretionary mitigation: Hambling alcohol while driving at the intersection during the period of suspended sentence due to a crime of any kind different from the grounds for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act; and failing to comply with a police officer’s request for measurement of drinking conducted upon receiving a report: Provided, That the same is recognized as committing a crime;