A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 09:30 on June 25, 2016, the Defendant, while driving a E-car in front of the D cafeteria located in Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant was required to comply with the alcohol alcohol test by inserting it in a manner of inserting it off three times, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was diving from a slope G belonging to the F Zone of the Suwonnam Police Station F Zone, and was driving under the influence of alcohol, due to the reduction of alcohol at a drinking-free season.

Nevertheless, the defendant refused this and did not comply with a police officer's request for a drinking test without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A report on investigation;

1. A report on the state of the state of the driving of a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, a report on the state of the driving of a motor vehicle under the alcohol;

1. On-site photographs, on-site images (the process leading up to the request for the measurement of alcohol in this case, which is recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, including each of the above evidence (the defendant was divingd in the driver's seat on the road, and was reduced by a police officer's drinking), the method and degree of police officer's demand for the measurement of alcohol (the demand for the measurement of alcohol through breath measurement at least three times over 30 minutes, and the confirmation of intention for the measurement of alcohol through blood sampling). The defendant's speech and behavior (the response to the question as to whether the use of the final drinking time or oral parliamentary system is refused, and the defendant's resident registration number is not inquired, and the reason and attitude that the defendant refused the measurement of alcohol (the defendant expressed his intention to refuse the measurement at the time of his request for the measurement of alcohol, and subsequent tobacco is to be smoking).

In other words, it is necessary to keep the police officer who has avoided it in time and delay the measurement of drinking, and finally refuse to conduct on-site measurement while going to a non-conditional police station.