A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:00 on February 13, 2014, the Defendant expressed the victim D (32 ) victim D(S) who was in C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at the same time, and expressed the victim’s desire to “the son, shot, shot,” on the ground that the victim did not pay the monthly salary of E, which is the seat of the Defendant, who was the seat of the Defendant, to whom he was working at C at C at C at C at the same time, but he took the victim’s speech without permission.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statements from witnesses D and F;

1. Some of the protocol concerning the interrogation of the police officers against the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of usb image Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 261 and 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the following grounds for sentencing);

1. The elements of sentencing unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act: The crime of this case is not deemed to have been committed by carrying dangerous articles, and the nature of the crime is not good in the means to have been committed; the sentencing factors favorable to the victim's wishing to punish: the crime of this case occurred in the course of a dispute between the victim and the victim's first resort against the defendant, and there are some circumstances to take into account the circumstances of the crime; the victim's direct contact with the victim does not appear to have been irrehing toward the victim (the victim's statement that it is not a direct contact with the victim's primary offender); the defendant is the primary offender; and the defendant's age, sexual behavior, and environment, and other various factors of sentencing indicated in the records of this case including the record of this case.