logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.07.15 2015고단2533
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On July 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 2, 01:05 around Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., “E”, performed faton dialogues with the victim G while playing a large amount of urgical talks; (b) fatnating the victim’s bat; (c) fating the victim’s bat; and (d) 1 fatt the victim’s fat, which is a dangerous object on the victim’s table, 500c cat (20cm in length), was collected to fit the victim’s shoulder.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous things with the victim and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as diversating the right part, which requires treatment for about four weeks.

2. The Defendant, at the above date, had about 10 customers at the above 10 occasions and places, frightened the fright, and attempted to enter the said fright together with a knife in the nearby Smarket. The Defendant interfered with the victim H’s main business by force, such as having a knife carried out a knife out from the drinking house, and having a flife and a mone in the vicinity of the said flife.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. Results of inquiries into the fact to the head of the East River Medical Center;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel did not have any fact that the defendant had a fright of beer with G, and there was no fact that the steel manufacturer used force, such as taking the fright of drinking house in the judgment of H operation, and there was no intention to obstruct the defendant's business; and

The argument is asserted.

The following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, i.e., (i) the victim G was at the investigative agency, while the Defendant was punished for trial expenses, and the Defendant was faced with the beer and the shoulder.

The statement is made, ② the victim H also consistently from the investigative agency to this court, ② the statement was made to G that the defendant was shouldered by the beer kn't, immediately after the time of the defendant and the victim G, and the defendant's statement was made.

arrow