logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.11.07 2016고단1713
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 13:24, July 25, 2016, placed in the Busan metropolitan traffic Daegu B, in the 2016 Busan metropolitan area; (b) around 13:24, the Defendant placed 20 cosmetics, such as cosmetics owned by the victim D, which were displayed in the store by making use of the gaps in the management of employees’ places; and (c) placed 330,000 won in the market price, and stolen them.

2. On August 6, 2016, the Defendant, around August 21, 2016, placed the amount equivalent to KRW 175,700, total market value on the following: (a) around August 6, 2016, at Csan store located in Busan Shipping Daegu E; (b) around 21:48, the victim F, displayed in the store by using the gaps in which his employees’ management was neglected; and (c) 10, such as dives of dives (i.e., cosmetics) and dives (i., the dives (i.e.

3. Around August 16, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime: (a) around 12:50 on August 16, 2016, the Defendant placed 10 cosmetics, such as Clocks, which were displayed in the store by taking advantage of the gaps in the management of employees at the above Clocks; and (b) placed the total amount of KRW 429,40,00 in the market price, and stolen them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each statement of D and F;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, in light of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case again even though he had a previous conviction in the same kind of crime, the criminal liability is important. However, the confession of the defendant, the victims and the defendant do not want the punishment against the defendant. The damaged goods are returned to the victims while the defendant was kept in custody, the defendant is being treated with shock disorder and depression, and the defendant's age and occupation are tried.

arrow