logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.02.13 2019고단94
출입국관리법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. If a foreigner in violation of the Immigration Control Act intends to continue to sojourn in excess of the period of sojourn, he/she shall obtain permission for extension from the Minister of Justice;

However, on December 8, 2014, the Defendant first entered the Republic of Korea upon obtaining permission to stay in Korea upon obtaining permission to extend the period of stay as the same qualification on July 23, 2015. On January 23, 2017, the Defendant continued to stay in Korea beyond the period of stay without obtaining permission to extend the period of stay from the Minister of Justice, despite the expiration of the period of stay on or around January 23, 2017.

2. On February 18, 2018, the Defendant: (a) discovered a flagrant offender in the crime of gambling at the 21:30th and the 3rd floor of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, who was arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of gambling; and (b) stated the police officer’s personal information, such as C’s alien registration number, when he/she took place as if he/she was a lawful fluor C.

On February 18, 2018, the Defendant entered C’s personal information in the form of a written statement at the 21:22, Ansan-si’s member B and 3, and stated in the main text that “The establishment of three large types of devices in the house was carried out D,” and forged one copy of C’s statement concerning proof of fact by stating the name of “C” for the purpose of exercising it without authority on the confirmation column of the horse and the investigative process confirmation certificate, and exercised it by delivering it to E police officers who are not aware of such forgery.

B. On February 19, 2018, at around 01:27, the Defendant entered the name of “C” for the purpose of exercising, without authority, a written waiver of ownership to the effect that “assigning three ownership of seized articles, for the purpose of exercising without authority,” in the criminal charge of the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station of the Gyeonggi-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government, the 373 Escam, and in the office of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station and the office, the Defendant used it to forgee a written waiver of ownership of rights and obligations, and to deliver it to F of the police officer who is aware of the forgery.

3...

arrow