logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.10.12 2017고단1184
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 6, 2017, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around 23:00, the victim E was in time to close the restaurant while drinking alcohol at the “D cafeteria” located in Seojin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seojin-gu; and (b) the victim E was in time to close the restaurant.

However, it is difficult for the victim to take the breath of the breath of the breath, so it was possible for the victim to take the breath of the tree in the above breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath,

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, upon receiving a report as a crime under paragraph 1, was voluntarily accompanied by the police officer called up, who was called up to F at the Jeonjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Police Station G in the Jeonjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

At around 00:32 on June 7, 2017, the Defendant was investigated as a charge of the damage of the said property, and solicited the Defendant to return home, but the Defendant: (a) “Embch farch fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech fech,” and (b) sent money to the Defendant.

Before having expressed the desire to "h. h.", the GJ of the said earth: (a) has committed an act that the saidJ seems to have knife and knife the knife to the Defendant, out of the earth; and (b) has knife the knife to the saidJ;

Han Jina Jinado do not have any fluorri, and Madar Madar Madar Madar Madar,

Han-Jin, "........." and both descendants assaulted the chest of the said J once.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is a police official in the performance of duties, interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning public peace and maintenance of order of the aboveJ.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement to E, J and K;

1. Photographs of the damaged person;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (to attachCCTV image data);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes.

arrow