A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 23, 2018, the Defendant destroyed the property owned by the victim by sticking the victim’s secret phone, card terminal, and back to the market price in the Kabter, on his/her hand, from the main underground stairs of the Busan Young-gu, Busan, and the victim D (50 Do) around January 23, 2018, for the same reason as the summary of the facts charged to dismiss the prosecution below, the Defendant damaged the property by sticking the victim’s possession of the property by sticking the victim’s secret phone, card terminal, and the inner illness in the Kabter.

2. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties is, on the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, and at the place set forth in paragraph 12, the Defendant heard the horses from F of the police officer belonging to the Youngdo Police Station E District of the Do Police Station, “I will talk about the business interfered with the business.” The Defendant, upon receiving a report from F of the police officer belonging to the Youngdo Police Station E District of the Do Police Station, was against

“In doing the bath theory as “,” and assaulted F’s fat, such as fating the bat and fating the F’s face, as the fating would be towards the F’s face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection and Observation, etc., Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Punishment of Specific Crimes / [the scope of the recommended punishment / [the scope of the punishment / [the scope of the recommended punishment] of the mitigation area (one to six months] of the mitigation area (one-six months), the reduction area (one-six months), the reduction area of the punishment (the person who is a special mitigated person] of the mitigation area of the punishment due to the aggravation of the punishment of the majority of the punishment, the scope of the final punishment due to violence committed against the defendant in six months to one year [the decision of the sentence].