logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.07.14 2016고단2007
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a B rocketing motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.137% at the section of about 250 meters, from the direction of the 250-meter radius near the Yellow-gu Geumdong to the Yellow-gu Geumdong, Daegu Suwon-gu, to the Handong-dong; (b) on March 7, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.137%.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in the operation of Brocketing motor vehicles.

On March 7, 2016, the Defendant driven the said vehicle at the Neng-ro of Daegu Singu, 300, and made the left turn at an unfest speed depending on the two-lane distance from among the roads on the five-lanes in the Yellow-gu.

At that time, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to proceed with at a safe speed and in a safe manner according to signals by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the signal.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not avoid the DNA car driven by the victim C(41 tax) who was in a straight line from the middle intersection of the Madern intersection to the yellow four-distance off from the middle intersection of the Madern intersection by neglecting to make a left-hand turn as it is in violation of the signal as mentioned in the above paragraph 1, and was not driven by the victim C(41 tax) who was in a straight line under the new code. The part after the defendant was driving the vehicle, the part after the right side of the vehicle being driven by the defendant was also

As a result, Defendant 2 suffered injury to the victim by negligence in the above occupational field, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection of drivers engaged in the primary business, a survey report on actual conditions, photographs, and diagnostic documents;

1. Article 148-2 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

arrow