A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven a Bspke vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 7km from the section of about 7km to the center in front of the Jindong-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, Seoul-gu, to the 2nd road of the Jincheon-gu, Seoul-gu, at around 00:50 on February 3, 2016, while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.231%.

2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a spke motor vehicle B in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary measures after an accident).

On February 3, 2016, the Defendant driving the said motor vehicle on the front of the D cafeteria located in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, about 00:50, and driving the motor vehicle at a non-speed speed depending on one of the four-lanes of the roads along the yellow-distance four-lanes.

At that time, there is a place where the center line of the yellow-ray is installed at night and at that time, and there was a motor vehicle with the F. F. F. F. F. P. 50 on the opposite part, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty

Nevertheless, the defendant did not avoid the above damaged vehicle that was driven by the center line due to the negligence of driving the center line while neglecting it under the influence of alcohol as set forth in the above Paragraph 1, which was driven by the yellow-distance outflow from the four-distance side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the madle, and the part of the motor vehicle operated by the defendant was the front part of the left-hand part of the damaged vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, did not immediately stop the damaged vehicle, and failed to take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the injured party, even though the damaged vehicle damaged the 890,678 won of repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1...