logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.01.18 2015가단12219 (1)
용역비
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 155,00,000 for the Plaintiff and KRW 20% per annum from July 3, 2015 to September 30, 2015; and (b) the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. C along with D, E, etc., is the head of an association that establishes the Defendant association to establish B-won Village (hereinafter “instant electric source village”) in the F-si and 19 parcels at permanent residence around 2011.

Around January 13, 2012, the defendant was authorized to establish a permanent city.

B. On December 16, 2011, C entered into a design service contract with G Co., Ltd. (the representative H, hereinafter “G”) on the instant electric village with respect to the following content:

Contract amount: The scope of services to be provided to A (C) by Article 3 (Scope of Services) of the KRW 400 million shall be the scope of services to be provided to A (C) by proxy for the procedures to be implemented by A under the Acts and subordinate statutes and municipal ordinances concerning buildings, which prepare basic plans, shop drawings, and other design documents necessary for the execution of construction works.

C. On December 20, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a design service contract with G and the instant electric village with the following content.

Services amount: The scope of services referred to in Article 2 (Separate Table of Value-Added Tax) (Plaintiff) of Article 2 (Scope of Services) of the Service Amounting to KRW 250 million shall be limited to civil engineering and design services for the development of the B Electric Village, and Eul shall perform the basic and working plans within the scope of the contract amount efficiently in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Service.

Around December 2011, the Plaintiff prepared a master plan for Jeonwon Village (No. 29) and submitted a proposal for village development projects (No. 15) under the name of the Defendant at the time of permanent residence around January 20, 2012, and was approved by the permanent Si on April 28, 2014.

E. Meanwhile, when the design service contract entered into between C and G was terminated in around 2012 when the Plaintiff was performing the design service business, the Defendant’s president instructed C to directly perform the design service for the entire village of this case, and the contract was not entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

F. The Plaintiff from G H during the period from December 20, 201 to December 30, 2011.

arrow