1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons why a party member who cited the judgment of the court of first instance explains this case are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding the following matters to the pertinent part, thereby citing it as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Additional matters;

A. In the end of the fourth sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the court below added the judgment that "(the plaintiff alleged that he entered into a lease contract for establishing a right to lease on a deposit basis with a deposit of KRW 70 million with respect to the real estate in this case, but there is no evidence to acknowledge the fact that the registration of the right to lease on a deposit basis necessary to establish the right to lease on a deposit basis as a real right

B. In Chapter 4, “No. 7” was added to “No. 5-1 of the judgment of the first instance court, which is the evidence submitted in the trial following the date of the first instance trial, and “E did not pay an objection” thereafter, “E was not delegated by the Seoul Eastern District Court on November 26, 2014 (a private document forgery, etc.)” from the Plaintiff on January 26, 2014, although there was no delegation from the Plaintiff on the right to lease or to prepare a lease contract of the instant real estate, it was forged by the instant letter of delegation around January 30, 2012 for the purpose of exercising the right. The Plaintiff’s agent qualification was forged, drafted the instant letter of lease agreement with the Plaintiff’s agent qualification, and the power to lease and lease written as above was duly formed.

The term "the fact that he/she has been convicted of one year of imprisonment for criminal facts" shall be added.

C. On the 6th end of the judgment of the court of first instance, “A, even if E had a forged power of attorney at the time of entering into the instant lease agreement, does not have the Plaintiff’s certificate of seal impression, certificate of seal impression, etc., so the Defendant does not directly verify the existence of E’s power of attorney with suspicion as to E’s power of attorney, etc.