logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.10.30 2015나31078
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons why a party member of the judgment of the court of first instance states concerning this case are added to the pertinent part and added to the supplement of the following are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. Additional matters and supplementary matters;

A. In addition, “No. 9” submitted at the trial room is added to the ground for recognition of No. 3 of the first instance judgment.

B. On the end of the fourth 14th th th th th th th th th 14 of the decision of the first th th th th 1944, “The plaintiff asserted that, while implementing the instant reservoir development project on the ground that the land was to be incorporated into the reservoir of this case, the land category of this case was changed from farmland to the maintenance of the reservoir of this case in 1958, and the construction of the reservoir of this case was completed in 1963. However, in full view of the purport of the arguments in evidence No. 7 and No. 1, the reservoir of this case was constructed in around 1945, and the defendant can be recognized that he repaired the bank of this case at KRW 110,000 for project expenses in 1963, the plaintiff's allegation in this part was without merit).”

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are not accepted as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow