1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) in total.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the court of first instance rejected each entry of evidence No. 14-1 to No. 5, which is insufficient to recognize the defendant's assertion as evidence submitted by the defendant in the trial; and (b) in addition to addition or dismissal as stated in paragraph (2), the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance

2. The addition or dismissal of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance refers to the “loan” in Section 8 of the judgment of the court of second instance as the “vehicle use.”

Then, "for the plaintiff, the defendant shall add "as a surety" to "for the plaintiff" at the second bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Then, “the 8th page of the judgment of the first instance court” was added to “the 501st page of the judgment of the first instance court” and “the 501st page of the instant C building was not implemented.”

3. According to the conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.