1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. At around 19:20 on Nov. 9, 2008, C driven a D vehicle that is covered by the Defendant’s comprehensive automobile insurance (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and driven a vehicle at a speed exceeding 22 km per hour at the time of the restriction, and go through a bank in the vicinity of the Sinririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririri where the signal, etc. is not installed, and C driven by E who turn to the left from the bank of the Yriririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririri, which is the wife, the Plaintiff was faced with the right side part of the Plaintiff, thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff, such as brain alkn, etc.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

On January 30, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for damages (hereinafter referred to as “prehion”) by this court’s 2013da150595, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant, and on November 5, 2014, the court of first instance recognized the Plaintiff’s payment of consolation money as the sum of KRW 1,085,50,50,000 calculated by subtracting the amount equivalent to the percentage of the Plaintiff’s fault in treatment expenses (0.7), out of the amount calculated by multiplying the Plaintiff’s hospitalization period (from November 9, 2008 to April 4, 2009) by the amount of KRW 8,49,788, the daily amount of the treatment period (from November 9, 200 to April 4, 209), and the amount of KRW 2,399,820,000 from the amount calculated by multiplying the Defendant’s liability ratio (0.7) of the medical expenses paid by the Defendant.

C. In the above case, the Plaintiff asserted that he suffered from a permanent disability with 14% labor ability to be lost on the part of the satisfaction of the instant accident, and sought a payment of the lost income (18,581,044 won) from the date of his release until the date of age of 67 after discharge. However, the court of the first instance in the previous case requested the appraisal to the president of the G Hospital corresponding thereto, etc., is sufficient to the right-hand part of the radiation photo so as to cause interference with the exercise on the right-hand side of the photo.