logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.04.30 2015고단103
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months, and by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

, however, the defendant from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving a car of DK3.

On November 18, 2014, the Defendant driven the above car at around 23:30 on November 18, 2014, and driven the two-lane road in front of the F Agency E in Chuncheon City, at the same distance distance from the front of the front of the city, the Defendant proceeded at about 40km each hour at a speed of about 40km.

At this point, there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, so there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle by reducing speed and checking well the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left on the opposite line by neglecting and proceeding the signal even though it was a stop signal, and received the front part of the front part of the taxi in Gro-ro driven by the victim B (the age of 66) who was driving from the front part of the said car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim B’s occupational negligence in the above 12th degree of the left-hand fluoral officer in need of the treatment between approximately 12 weeks, and jointly with the victim H(the age of 43) who took advantage of the said car due to the occupational negligence, suffered approximately 10 weeks of the left-hand fluoral in need of the treatment of approximately 4 weeks.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving a Gro-cab.

At around 23:30 on November 18, 2014, the Defendant driven the above taxi and made the two-lane road in front of the F agency in Chuncheon-si E turn to the left at the right turn at the full-time distance from the front side of the Ansan-si.

At this point, there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, so there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle by reducing speed and checking well the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and the signal is a stop signal.

arrow