logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.03.06 2013고단5098
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months, and by a fine of four thousand won for Defendant B.

Defendant

B above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving of cargo trucks in E 25.2 tons.

On April 1, 2013, at around 05:15, the Defendant proceeded with a two-lane road in front of the shooting distance of the Magamban apartment located in the Gyeongdong-gu, Gyeongdong-gu, Gyeongdong-gu, Gyeongdong-gu, Gyeongdong-do, at about 67 km each hour according to the two-lanes from the Magamban apartment room.

At the same time, there was an on-and-off intersection in which signal lights are on-and-off, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by checking whether there is another vehicle driving in front of the intersection by stopping and temporarily in front of the intersection.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and went through the intersection as it is, due to the negligence of entering the intersection, received the FK5 car's right side side part of the FK5 car driven by B, which is the left side part of the vehicle driven by the defendant, from the south-west and the south-west side of the intersection, and continued to proceed by the shock, and received the front part of the vehicle driven by the defendant, a factory building owned by the victim Mast Co., Ltd.

Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the above factory building by occupational negligence to cover KRW 213,896,00.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in FK5 driving duties for automobiles.

On April 1, 2013, at around 05:15, the Defendant proceeded with a two-lane road in front of the shooting distance of the Magamban-gun, Seog-gu, Seogdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, in a speed of about 70km from the boundary of the South and North U.S., to the tinbris.

At the same time, there was an on-and-off intersection in which signal lights are on-and-off, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by checking whether there is another vehicle driving in front of the intersection by stopping and temporarily in front of the intersection.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and proceeds as it is.

arrow