A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Criminal facts

[criminal power] On September 8, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of eight months for the purpose of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. at the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court, which was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, Etc.) at the Jung-gu District Court on July 10, 201, and completed the execution of the said sentence at the Jung-gu Prison prison on October 3, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

On January 22, 2015, at the H District District of the Gyeonggi-gu Gyeonggi Police Station located in Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, G, the Defendant found the above earth while under the influence of alcohol, and misleads the Defendant as a police officer who was investigating the case on which the Defendant was charged for detention, and stated that the Defendant “I” was “I”, and said I was off the Defendant’s personal injury by harming the said I, and used the two computer monitoring devices in front of the said I, such as harming the said I.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to their duties and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Photographs and case-related photograph;

1. Previous records before ruling: Application of inquiries, such as criminal records, investigation reports (report attached to judgments, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders [the scope of recommending punishment] The basic area of obstruction of performance of official duties (six months to one year and four months) / [decision of sentence] the defendant committed the crime of this case by contingency, and there are favorable circumstances that repent his mistake and reflect his mistake.

However, the crime of this case is not good, and the defendant is a police officer who has investigated the case which was detained.