A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around January 26, 2020: (a) around 08:10, the Defendant assaulted the victim by plucking, plucking, plucking, plpling, and cutting down the victim’s shoulder and arms, and breaking up the victim’s shoulder and arms at the elevator of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment B apartment building C, 4, which was called to take out emergency call in the state of drinking, with the condition of drinking.

2. On January 26, 2020, the Defendant assaulted at the waiting room of the Seoul Mapo Police Station located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the ground that he was arrested in the act of committing an act of committing an offense on the ground of paragraph (1) and that he was fluored with the hand, and that he was fluored with the hand, thereby checking the Defendant’s handure, and that the police officer G belonging to the said earth was fluor at the time when he was fluort with the Defendant’s left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers and the management of new soldiers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G and D;

1. Application of each investigation report (B elevator CCTV and CCTV in the F District)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The criminal liability of the defendant is not weak, such as assaulting the victim D under the influence of the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, assaulting the police officer dispatched after receiving 112 report, obstructing the performance of his duties, etc.

However, the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the fact that the defendant is fully aware of the crime, the fact that there is no record of the crime exceeding the fine, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, etc., shall be determined as the order.