beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 21,650,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from December 24, 2013 to March 12, 2014.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the Plaintiff is an insurer entrusted with the government-guaranteed business that compensates for damage to the victim of a traffic accident without an insurance policy within the insurance coverage of liability insurance.
B. On March 12, 2013, at around 16:10, the Defendant: (a) driven a small-sized B-sized cargo vehicle not covered by the liability insurance (hereinafter referred to as “b-sized vehicle”); (b) driven a 804-dong, Southern-dong, Chungcheongnam-dong, Gwangju mine; and (c) driven a one-lane in the vicinity of the road from the 4-distance off the 4-distance off from the 4-lane to the 4-distance off; and (d) went into the above 3-lane, the Defendant changed the course to the 3-lane to the 3-lane in order to overtake the 3-lane, the Defendant incurred the instant accident (hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”) by causing the D driving the said 0-lane to incur the injury to the left-hand side of the vehicle, which requires treatment for approximately seven weeks under the direction of the left-hand side (hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”).
C. On May 7, 2013, the Plaintiff paid KRW 6,651,940 as medical expenses, and KRW 14,848,060 as damages on December 20, 2013. On December 23, 2013, the Plaintiff paid KRW 2,1650,00 as insurance money for government’s security projects under the Act on Private Participation in the Accident, such as paying KRW 150,00 to Nonparty E with disability diagnosis expenses.
[Identification Evidence] Evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Evidence No. 4-1, 2, A-6, and Evidence No. 10
2. The occurrence and scope of liability for damages is the insurer entrusted with the business of guaranteeing motor vehicle accident compensation, and the Plaintiff paid insurance money to the victim D, and thus it is possible to claim compensation against the victim D by subrogation. Therefore, it is first against the Defendant of D.