logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.05.01 2019고단255
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 13, 2019, at around 04:30, the Defendant reported 112 that money was lost on the first floor of the Bab, and then sent out to the Defendant as well as the Defendant, while ascertaining the circumstances of the instant case, he sent out the Mabna Police Station C District Unit of the Maba Police Station that was called out after receiving the said report, and was able to see why the Defendant left the Mabel with the Defendant, and her hand, her hand was sleeping the Mabro of the above patrole E. After leaving the Mabel’s parking lot, the Defendant sleepd the above Da and E gabbbling that the Defendant demanded accompanying the earth to process the instant case. On the same day, around 04:50 on the same day, the Defendant carried out voluntarily as the Mabna, as the Mabna, and prepared the written statement in the said Mabna.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. Work site in the C District;

1. Each statement of opinion;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes by capturing a suplice image;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. After the sentence of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was sentenced to the suspension of execution of imprisonment due to obstruction of performance of official duties in 2007, the sentence shall be determined as per the order, comprehensively taking into account all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., and the fact that there was no record of criminal punishment except for a fine of KRW 300,000,000,000 for the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act in 2011.

arrow