A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 25, 2018, around 20:53, at the “C” restaurant located in Gwangju-si B, the Defendant: (a) while ascertaining the circumstances of the instant case, including E, etc., of the staff of the luminous Police Station D Boxes called out after having received the 112 report, and called out after having received the 112 report; (b) led the Defendant to wear the said restaurant proprietor and sound; (c) the circumstances E, in front of the Defendant, was boomed by both hand, and the Defendant committed assaulting E’s shoulders over several occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more (including the fact that there is no criminal record for the defendant, but there is a criminal record for the probation, the degree of interference with the execution of official duties, and the fact that the damaged police officer punished the defendant);