logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.10.20 2016구단55202
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On August 25, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) was diagnosed as “the instant wound” during the 71st century, 165 joint and several companies, and was discharged from military service on September 14, 2015, while serving in the 71st century 165 joint and several companies; and (b) was discharged from military service.

On September 21, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground of the instant wounds. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision that the instant wounds did not constitute the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished service to the Plaintiff on the ground that they were suffering from ordinary job performance rather than performing duties directly related to national security, etc., and that they meet the requirements for persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition and the overall purport of the pleading as to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition, the Plaintiff received training from the left-hand knee before entering the Gun, but suffered an injury to the left-hand knee of the entire knee, among the military roads of the complete knife, on January 2015, and subsequently caused the injury. On April 2015, 2015, the instant injury was aggravated due to the Plaintiff’s continuous training and physical activities in the military units, such as the knife, and the knife of the Plaintiff’s bridge.

Therefore, since the difference in this case occurred during training directly related to national security and security, the defendant's disposition that did not recognize the plaintiff as a soldier or policeman on duty is unlawful.

Facts of recognition

On February 4, 2015, the Plaintiff has a sufficient tool before February 4, 2015.

After the birth of the left-hand knee, the left-hand knee has been admitted to the 71st class stage of the 71st class.

In addition, on April 18, 2015, there was a pain again, and the table was treated as a part of the clinic by visiting the clinic to the clinic.

On April 23, 2015, the plaintiff was given medical treatment for the left-hand knee in the National Armed Forces Capital Hospital.

arrow