logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.11.16 2017구단54282
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 6, 2015, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on July 6, 2016.

B. On July 13, 2016, the Plaintiff asserted to the Defendant that “In the course of training on January 1, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) led to a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation; (b) applied for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation.”

C. On December 13, 2016, the Defendant rendered a notification to the Plaintiff on the following grounds: “The Defendant did not meet the requirements of Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons of Distinguished Service to the State”) regarding the instant wounds, and was recognized as meeting the requirements of Article 2(1)2 (the Act on the Support of Persons of Distinguished Service to the State)” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 2 (including virtual number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. On December 6, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that: (a) the Plaintiff sustained minor injuries on knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne

B. The “education and training” referred to in Article 4(1)6 of the Act on Persons of Distinguished Services to the State.

arrow