1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 23, 2009, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from the military on April 22, 201, and stated that “In September 2009, the Plaintiff performed an operation at a university hospital through medical examination and treatment at a military hospital after skne, knee, knee, in several times, among the e-Gun roads with the complete Gun in mountain around September 2009.” On February 24, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “the instant difference”).

B. On June 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) constitutes a person eligible for veteran’s compensation under the Act on Support for Persons Eligible for Veteran’s Compensation; (b) however, it does not meet the requirements for a person of distinguished service to the State under the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State; and (c) thus, the Defendant’s disposition

(c) The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the instant disposition, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission rendered a ruling dismissing the said claim on September 22, 2015. 【Facts without dispute over the grounds for recognition, Party A’s entries in evidence Nos. 7 and 8, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State, since the Plaintiff’s active duty or education and training directly related to the security of national security, etc. is deemed to fall under the requirements of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State, since the Plaintiff’s assertion is a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State, while serving as a communications soldier by combining the communications equipment (20 km) and the military with the weight of about 50 km to the point of 50 km, making it difficult for the Plaintiff to get a strong sloped from the mountain Hane-gun in the process of doing so.

B. (1) The details of the national health insurance benefits for the Plaintiff do not contain any data that had previously been or had been treated by the disease related to the instant wound before entering the National Health Insurance Plan, but the records of the extracurricular medicine of the Yong-Namnam National University Hospital on December 10, 2009.