beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. On September 10, 2016, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force on the part of the victim H (the victim’s body was intentionally faced with the Defendant’s body on the part of the back of the victim’s left body, following the victim H (the victim’s name, leisure, 30 years of age) in front of F neighboring G in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 10, 2016.
2. In regard to the determination, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was faced with the victim in front of his/her own way while the Defendant was on the way, and was faced with the victim in front of his/her own way, and the Defendant intentionally faced with the victim's body, or denied the facts charged by him/her, not with the victim's her but with his/her her mack.
In this court, the victim stated that the defendant intentionally faced with the left upper part of the victim's left upper part of the victim's body, and that the left upper part of the victim's her hand was cut off.
However, according to the records, the defendant seems to have been under the influence of alcohol to the extent that the situation at the time of facing the victim due to the drinking during and after the mountain (the inner body part, the part of the left body part), the victim in the form of physical contact with the victim at the time of the defendant and the victim met the body of the victim in the police, and the victim met the body of the victim (the part of the victim's body, and the part from the shoulder) after leaving the weight into the body.
Although it is net, the perpetrator was faced with with the above, and her her sent was in contact with her hand.
shall be deemed to have been.
The son did not state her her but his her her her son.
In light of the above, the perpetrator’s body faced with her body over the left part of the body, and the perpetrator’s her son contacted the left part of the body, and the perpetrator’s her her tacks with his her her her mack. In light of the above, the Defendant, who was walking in the direction of I, was her son’s son’s body and her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son. However, the Defendant was her body contact with the Defendant.