The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that Defendant E was aware of the intention to commit an indecent act, and thus, the lower court acquitted Defendant E of the facts.

2. Determination

A. The lower court determined as follows: (a) in light of the following: (i) the movement of the Defendant, E, employees, and Defendant’s daily activities, and (ii) the legal statement that the Defendant “sponsed to the Defendant’s clothes”; and (b) the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone was insufficient proof of the facts charged that the Defendant intentionally her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

The court rendered a judgment of innocence on the grounds that it could not be seen.

B. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below's decision as follows, namely, F at the time of the instant case, also fell from the Defendant's cell phone in the court of the court below's "I am urgently out of the E, which caused the decrease of the cell phone in the water, and there was a large amount of water on the wind of the Defendant."

Therefore, the Security Department of the Defendant had been in the cellular phone in order to receive the death.

E을 손등으로 툭 쳤다 ”라고 진술하고 있는 점을 보태어 보면, 위와 같은 원심의 판단은 정당하고 거기에 사실을 오 인한 위법이 없다.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.