Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. Summary of the facts charged
A. On June 26, 2012, the Defendant was present at the court below’s trial as a witness for the damage of property against D No. 2012 high-class 354 of the above court where D was indicted for the charge that D gave rise to the cutting of G-owned land (hereinafter “instant land”) located in the Gyeonggi-gu, Sin-gu, Sin-si, Sin-si, Sin-si, and stated as “e-mail” to the prosecutor’s question, “I did not give the witness instructions to cut or cut the instant land,” which is the prosecutor’s question.
However, there was a fact that the Defendant directly set up a place to cut the instant land at the site of the instant land and ordered cutting the instant land.
Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement as above and perjury.
B. On December 20, 2012, the Defendant appeared at the Suwon District Court located in Suwon-gu 80, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, as a witness in the second instance trial of the Property Damage Case No. 2012No4519, and took an oath by law, the Defendant stated in the prosecutor’s question, “I would like to say that I would not intervene in Defendant D, and I would like to say that I would not make a daily report to Defendant D for three days according to E’s testimony at the first instance trial,” and “I would like to comply with H’s instructions because I would know of the witness, and I would like to respond to the position of H,” and “I would like to answer the presiding judge’s question,” “I would like to answer the witness’s questions whether I would be “I would like to answer,” and “I would like to answer the witness’s questions”.
However, facts are the defendants.