logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.12.12 2014고정2524
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 300,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

(a) Any person who intends to run livestock product processing business due to an unauthorized livestock product processing business shall obtain permission from the competent authority;

Nevertheless, the Defendant from July 12, 2014 to the same year.

8. Until the end of 27, livestock product processing business was not reported by the competent authorities, and the head of pigs was processed by being equipped with two cleaning facilities, air conditioners, knife knife knife knife knife knife knife, knife knife knife knife and gnife knife knife knife

Accordingly, the Defendant run a livestock product processing business without permission.

(b) No person who violates the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act due to sale of unauthorized processed livestock products shall sell processed livestock products by any person who fails to obtain permission;

The Defendant, at the same date and time as paragraph (1) of Article 1, laid head of the processed swine head at the place as above, put them into the plastic stuff, put them in the plastic stuff, stored them again in the yellow plastic stuff, stored them in the cooling house, or sold them to a restaurant in a conventional market, such as E swine head boom.

Accordingly, the Defendant sold processed livestock products by a person who did not obtain permission.

2. Defendant B is a livestock product seller operating G in Daegu-gu F.

A business operator of a livestock product sales business and his/her employees shall prepare a detailed document stating the date of sale, place of sale, sales volume, etc. with respect to transactions between business operators in order to maintain sanitary control and trade order at the time of conducting business, and keep such document for two years from

Nevertheless, around September 2014, the Defendant supplied A with by-products, such as head of pigs, etc. from the above G, and had recorded the transaction documents from July 2, 2014 in relation to the transaction.

8.27. Only keeping the details of transactions until 27. They did not destroy and keep the previous documents of transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow