logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.04.13 2016나23809
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The court's reasoning concerning this case is that the part concerning the defendant in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the part concerning the defendant in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the five, five, six parts of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, the court's reasoning is that it

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of evidence Nos. 3-1, 2, 7-1, 2-1, 2-1, and 2-2 of evidence Nos. 3-1, 7-1, and 2, the Plaintiff and the Defendant purchased from G on March 30, 2004 a sum of KRW 265,200,000,000 for each of 1/2 shares, respectively. ② The Plaintiff, the Defendant and the Defendant agreed to complete the registration of ownership transfer of the whole land in lieu of the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s registration of ownership transfer for each of 1/2 shares as the issue of the qualification certificate for acquisition of farmland. ③ Accordingly, on April 30, 204, the fact that the registration of ownership transfer for the entire land was completed on April 30, 200, there is no counter-proof evidence. Accordingly, the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s claim for the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s claim for the registration of ownership transfer under the title trust agreement is dismissed.

arrow