A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

around May 23, 2014, the Defendant concluded a construction service agreement with the employees of the said company E (F) office located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Co., Ltd., Ltd.) (hereinafter “F”) around May 23, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “Around June 5, 2014, the Defendant would make the said company to produce structures to install solar power sources and to allow the installation of solar valvess and servers. In advance, the Defendant wired KRW 4.5 million to the advance payments and purchased necessary materials in advance if he/she supplies solar winds and servers, and completed the construction of solar power generators around June 5, 2014 and completed the construction of solar power generation around the 25th of the same month.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to construct solar power generation devices because he did not wish to use it for the purpose of repaying other obligations even if he received advance payment, solar energy ruptures, and ruptures from the victim in excess of his obligation such as delayed payment of wages to human beings at the construction site.

The Defendant, on May 23, 2014, transferred 4.5 million won from the Victim Company to the Enterprise Bank Account (IBK) Bank Account (Account Number H) in the name of the Defendant on May 23, 2014, and around the 28th day of the same month, 10 solar 10,000 won in the market value, around the 28th day of the same month;

6.4Around the 27,156,250 won of the city, respectively, received solar light 125 copies.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim company.

The Defendant, around October 2014, 2014, ordered the victim I to undertake the housing repair work at his/her mother-friendly K's home located in theJ of Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Seoul, and received a request from the victim for the said housing repair work.

However, in fact, the Defendant had the intent to use the construction cost received from the victim due to excessive debt at the time for repayment of other debt. Therefore, even if the construction cost is received from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to perform the cost.

The defendant shall belong to the victim.