logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.08.24 2015고정185
업무방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are married and the victims C(the age of 35) are the persons who operated a private teaching institute as Defendant A and the same business.

1. Crimes committed on July 22, 2014 around 15:00;

A. On July 22, 2014, Defendant B stated that Defendant B’s defamation of the Defendants called “Woo Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok,” and Defendant A said that “Woo Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok Dok

However, the fact was that the civil litigation on the settlement of accounts between the defendant A and the victim was in progress, so it was impossible to conclude that the victim did not pay the settlement money to the above defendant.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false representation in public, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

B. The Defendants were unable to properly proceed with the class by avoiding disturbance between about 30 minutes, including the said remarks at the above time and place. The Defendants conspired with and by force interfered with the education and training of the victims.

C. Defendant A assaulted Defendant A, at the time and place above, the victim, who attempted to restrain himself, such as drinking satise and shoulder satisf.

2. From around 19:00 on July 22, 2014 to 19:00 on the same day, Defendant B told that, at the entrance of the building of the above private teaching institute from around 16:00 to around 19:00 on the same day, Dives in the above private teaching institute mean that, for students, “at home, I are the president of this private teaching institute, and there is no change in the present fraud,” and Defendant A said, “The president is a change in the morale.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false representation in public, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

3. Defendant A’s July 23, 2014

arrow