logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.06.26 2014고정298
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant

A, B, C, D, E, and F shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,00,00 for each of them, Defendant G, and H shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,00 for each of them, and Defendant I shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 1, 2012, the Defendants jointly committed a crime (violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion) by all the Defendants: (a) found the victim’s house in the U.S. O apartment 208 Dong 104, Busan Northern-gu, and (b) sought the victim’s house in the victim’s house, and (c) Defendant D heard the first race sound and entered the victim’s house room together with the rest of the Defendants.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly intruded upon the victim’s residence.

2. Defamation;

A. Although Defendant B did not say that the victim had graduated from the sexual intercourse at the date, time, and place under paragraph (1), Defendant B appears to have written “S” written in Q of School Students’ Indictment.

At a place where two other persons (P and R) are located, the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by sound, “Franc, sexual intercourse, sexual intercourse fraud, and the universities inside Seoul,” and “satisfafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafababa,” which read “fafafa

B. Although Defendant C did not have any fact that the victim received money or forged an educational background at the date and time and place under paragraph (1), the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by stating the following facts: “The Defendant’s reputation shall be damaged by putting the victim in Q and two other (P, R) places where the Plaintiff was a private teaching institute student Q and 2 (R).” “When it is replaced by fraud, it shall be turfed, turfed, turfed, and turfed, and turfed,” and “the head of a private teaching institute in the Republic of Korea.”

C. The Defendant D did not have forged the victim’s educational background at the date, time, and place under paragraph (1).

arrow