logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.04.20 2016고정397
명예훼손등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who worked as an instructor at the center of “E” located in Ansan from December 2, 2012 to December 2014, 2014, and Defendant B was a person who worked as an instructor at the center of the above E from around 2010 to around 2012. Defendant B is a person who worked as an instructor at the center of the above E; the victim F (n.e., the age of 41) is the head of the above E, and the victim G (n., the age of 35) is a vice president.

1. The Defendants’ defamation was heard by J, which is a volunteer fee, at around August 2013, in the first week located in Pyeongtaek-si in Gyeonggi-si, and the victims were only between the original president and the vice president, and the victims were not Lesvina, despite the fact that the victims were not Lesvina, “E is Esvina, the original president and the vice president are Lesvina, and the vice president is the same male head, and we are the same male head, and we live together with the president, and we would like to have a day and go up to how much the president is.

“The dialogue was made to the effect that it was “....”

As a result, the Defendants conspired, thereby impairing the honor of the victims by openly pointing out false facts.

2. The Defendants: (a) spread false information, such as the date and time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) and at the same time, and (b) spreads such false information as described in paragraph (1); (c) the members of the members of the House in need of E give up re-registration or cancel the registration; and (d) allow customers who want to join the House in E to give up their subscription, thereby interfering with the smooth operation of E.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the original operation of the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness G, F, J, and K;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of J, K, G, L, M, N, andO

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1), 313, and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow