logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.05.08 2013고합68
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who intends to conduct domestic fee-charging job placement services in violation of the Employment Security Act shall register with the Governor of a Special Self-Governing Province or the head of a Si/Gun

Nevertheless, without registering with the competent authority, the Defendant operated a news report box in the name of “F” from February 2, 201 to March 201, 201; from March 3, 2012 to November 201, 201, “G” from March 201 to November 201, the Defendant employed H as a driver and introduced female helpers to the neighboring entertainment establishments using I Tdra, and received KRW 35,000 per hour, and acquired KRW 5,00 among them.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with H to conduct free and fee-charging job placement services.

2. On April 2012, 2012, the Defendant violated the Attorney-at-Law Act said that, in the Nowon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, the J (this name K) who was employed by himself as an employee from his “G” sidewalk, reported to the YY, and the victim L who operates another news release would be allowed to investigate the case as a whole without giving money to the police. In order to carry out government work, two million won should be required.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he was only planned to consume the money with the cost of living and did not have the intention or ability to make a solicitation.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, was given KRW 2 million throughO in front of the “N club” in the same Gu M around May 1, 2012 under the pretext of deceiving the victim and making solicitation for the case handled by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol regarding H;

1. Each statement made by the police officer against J, L, andO;

1. Statement of H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes entered in the investigation report (the attachment of details of transactions to the defendant living together);

1. Article 47 subparagraph 1 of the Employment Security Act and Article 19 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow