Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, at around 21:30 on February 14, 2017, at the same time, had been dissatisfied with the alcohol plant, for which Defendant A demanded to be aware of the fact from the Defendant’s fashion market to the outside of the original son.

The Defendants, from the above staff member of the alcohol house, assaulted the E (46) of the police box belonging to the Dong-dong Police Station D (46) who was dispatched to the site after receiving 112 reports, and the request for returning home was defective; Defendant B took a bath, f (34) f (34) f; Defendant B took a ebbbbbbb, ebb, and ebb, and eb, Defendant A’s hand carried and pushed off the ebb, and Defendant A took the ebb, and f took the ebb, and f eb, walked the eb, and f took the eb, walked.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged victims;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 and 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Interference with the performance of official duties] Type 1 (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of official duties) in the basic area ( June -1 June -6), the Defendants assaulted the police officers who called the drinking house business owner by drinking alcohol with a report 112 and perform their official duties in a legitimate manner, and assaulted the police officers who were called up to the scene of being forced to undergo an investigation by an investigative agency, and therefore, it is not very good that the Defendants committed a crime and a criminal fact in that they are consistent with the defense that they are not memory under the influence of alcohol at the time of investigation

All the Defendants had been punished several times in the past, and Defendant B was punished by a fine for obstructing the performance of official duties in 2015.

However, the defendants' confession, reflect, and not repeat the crime in the court.

b) the point at issue; and