beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for eight months, respectively.
However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 17, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at Suwon Friwon, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on the same day on the same day.
Defendant
B On January 12, 2012, the District Court sentenced the suspension of the execution of two years to 10 months of imprisonment for fraud at the District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on the 20th of the same month.
[2] The Defendants and D purchased a used vehicle as security and received a loan from the installment financing company, taking advantage of the fact that the installment financing company provides 80% of the market price of the vehicle in accordance with the standard table according to the type of the vehicle and the production year without confirming the status of the vehicle in question or actual sale price of the vehicle in question, the Defendants and D conspired to obtain money by deceiving the installment financing company as if they purchased the vehicle in the document after purchasing the vehicle remaining only in the document form, and then by deceiving the company of installment financing as if they purchased the vehicle at a normal price.
D) On May 2010, the F and Dogs introduced through F and F, which obtained a loan from F and F, which were introduced through F and F, to acquire money in the form of a document purchase in the form of a document purchase, and Defendant B introduced Defendant A, who is a used vehicle with which he professionally mediates it, to D.
1. On May 13, 2010, Defendants and D applied for a loan of KRW 29,900,000 to the victim J Co., Ltd. for a loan of KRW 29,90,000 from the H office located only in the name of document No. 320, in the name of document No. 11:00 on May 13, 2010, and received a loan from the injured party for a loan of KRW 29,90,000 for the purchase of the said car on the same day.
Accordingly, the Defendants and D conspireded to acquire the above money from the injured party.
2. In addition, the Defendants and D would have purchased K rocketing vehicles in the same way only on the documents.