Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A is a second class trading business entity, Defendant A is a second class trading business entity, Defendant A is a seated person, Defendant B is a seated person, and Defendant B is a seated person.

Defendant

A intends to pay money to D with a loan by deceiving a borrower as if he/she purchases a heavy vehicle.

The title holder of the purchase was proposed to the effect that “I will receive the loan by pretending that I will purchase a heavy difference in his name,” and that “I will receive the loan by introducing Defendant B,” and Defendant B received only money from the principal owner without purchasing the loan by making the documents available to the borrower and making it available to the lender.

If a loan is granted, three million won will be paid.

Recognizing to the purport of “the purpose of this,” there was a conspiracy to obtain loans from a lending company and acquire them by fraud by iceizing a secondhand transaction.

After July 21, 2017, Defendant A searched GMW car that Defendant A’s father E and name are same with that of Defendant A and F put in lots, and found, Defendant B had Defendant B possess loan-related documents.

In addition, the Defendants and D falsified the same day, around 17:00, to the employees in charge of the loan, who were in charge of the loan in the main office of the victim corporation located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, 49 (Wean-dong) and the main office of the victim corporation located in the third floor 303, and their names were unknown. “The employees in charge of the loan to purchase the GW car in B’s name.”

However, in fact, Defendants and D did not have the intent or ability to live in the said BMW car, and they thought that they would be personally useful when they received a loan, and thus, they did not have the intent and ability to repay the loan even if they were given a loan from the beginning.

Defendants and D, as seen above, deceiving the employees in charge of loans belonging to the victim, and they are using 3,5960,000 won, excluding 40,000 won from 36,000 won of loans from the said employees on the same day to the post office account in the name of father E of Defendant A, for a lending company, the loans are used for any purpose other than the purchase of automobiles.